Outsourcing and the Cloud

Until now, most of the discussion about the benefits of cloud computing and its variants such as software as a service (SaaS) have centered on the time and money manufacturers and other businesses can save by replacing on-premise data centers and traditional software licensing models with Web-enabled services that are paid for on a subscription basis.

This is essentially an argument for reducing IT costs, and it’s one that may make sense for many companies, assuming they can satisfy themselves that cloud environments are reliable and secure and that cloud-based applications deliver an acceptable level of industry-specific functionality.

But is all the noise about cloud computing really just about shaving a few bucks off the IT budget? If so, should manufacturing line-of-business and C-suite executives pay much attention to the whole discussion? Don’t they have bigger fish to fry, such as innovating business strategies and making sure that core business processes — especially those that directly touch customers — are running as smoothly and profitably as possible?

It turns out that cloud computing may, in fact, play a role in helping manufacturing executives streamline business processes, not just bring down IT costs. Several business process outsourcing service providers — particularly Indian BPO service providers —are fast-tracking initiatives

intended to combine outsourcing services and cloud computing.

Under the traditional model, when companies outsource business processes such as end-to-end order management or human resources management, the supporting technology — data centers, applications, etc. — doesn’t change much. The applications may be moved to a third-party data center, but they’re still owned and paid for by the manufacturer.

Now outsourcing providers such as Wipro Technologies and Infosys are exploring ways to combine BPO services with cloud-based infrastructure and applications. That would enable customers to outsource entire business processes — the people and the supporting technology — and pay for all of it according to how much is used.

Infosys seems furthest along on this path. Recently I met with Chandrashekar Kakal, Infosys’ senior vice president and global head of its enterprise solutions group, to discuss what the company calls its Infosys Business Platforms. The company is building a series of business process-specific platforms — hardware, applications, and industry-specific extensions — that will be cloud-based and used exclusively to support Infosys’ BPO offerings. So far, Infosys has built three such platforms. They support procurement and HR management processes as well as processes that are specific to publishing and media businesses. Infosys plans to add more, including multi-channel order management, according to Kakal.

This approach would seem to make sense for both Infosys and its customers. Customers could outsource entire business processes and pay based on how much they use. The cost of the procurement BPO service — including supporting technology — would be based on total spend, for example. So costs for the customer would be controllable, predictable, and scalable (assuming Infosys is able to design its platforms in a scalable fashion).

And the approach allows Infosys to offer an all-in-one BPO service while keeping its own costs under control. The company plans to use third-party data centers to reduce up-front capital investment. At the same time, Infosys gains operational flexibility, with the ability to deploy cloud-based applications from one location while Infosys staff provide outsourced business processes in another.

Of course, such a new business model will raise all kinds of technical and business challenges. Under the pay-for-service pricing model, for example, how can Infosys afford to write big up-front checks to partners such as Oracle and SAP for the applications on which the new Business Platforms will be based? Infosys has managed to negotiate new pricing models with its large enterprise application providers, Kakal says.

Another question is what customers will do with the investment they’ve made in software and data centers once they sign up for this type of all-inclusive, cloud-enable BPO? In the old days of outsourcing, providers would often compensate customers to cover the sunk cost of those assets. Will companies such as Infosys be able to do that under the new pay-for-service model? Infosys is working on that, Kakal says.

Assuming Infosys and other outsourcing providers can answer such questions, cloud computing could very soon become a topic of interest among line-of-business and C-level execs, not just IT executives.

Follow me on Twitter

This entry was posted in Enterprise Applications, Systems & Integration and tagged , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink. Post a comment or leave a trackback: Trackback URL.

8 Comments

  1. Posted June 25, 2010 at 9:22 pm | Permalink

    It will be interesting to see how the pricing models compare, and how diverse they will be.

  2. Ritesh Marriott
    Posted March 15, 2010 at 9:30 pm | Permalink

    Very true. Infact, I liked the blog on similar lines at Infosys website http://www.infosysblogs.com/oracle/2010/03/managed_solution_for_staffing.html
    For a Staffing Industry solution and I complete concur to thoughts of this individual. May be Jude Reinhart should check with this individual /Kakal on what else they are doing for Back office IT.

    Thanks
    Ritesh M

  3. Posted March 10, 2010 at 2:51 pm | Permalink

    Nice post. I absolutely agree that the cloud has managed to paint itself into a corner here: it is only about outsourcing sysadmins to bring down IT cost. Or so it seems.

    Software as a Service (SaaS) can be much more than that. You mentioned for example the need to improve business processes. We are seeing a large rise in the number of business process management solutions that are being delivered under a SaaS model. This is good for IT, because they never wanted to install yet another piece of software in the data center, and great for the strategy and operational executives who need a way to really get the rest of the organization to run well. Especially in organizations that aren’t in a position to outsource their processes or where the processes define what they do (can you imagine FedEx outsourcing the delivery of packages), business process management (BPM) and workflow software is the best way to constrain office and service processes, to allow them to be improved, made more efficient, produce a better a quality work product with less rework. Deliver that through SaaS, so you don’t have to burden IT even more and then you have a really lean organization on your hands.

    Nice work!

    Phil
    http://blog.consected.com

  4. Posted March 9, 2010 at 12:57 pm | Permalink

    Julie–No customer names yet. But we’ll follow up with Kakal.

    Jeff

  5. Posted March 8, 2010 at 1:34 pm | Permalink

    Jude–No customer names so far. But, be assured, we’re working on that.

    Thanks.

    Jeff

  6. John Raftery
    Posted March 6, 2010 at 12:06 am | Permalink

    Cool! Good to see Infosys’ cloud kicking up some dust!!

    Let’s see what the competition comes out with.

  7. Jude Reinhart
    Posted March 6, 2010 at 12:03 am | Permalink

    Interesting! Curious as to who the key players are in this genre. Given the size and credibility of Infosys, it makes sense that they’ve been able to influence the big product players into creating new and innovative pricing models. My business is Insurance, and I am keen to understand what levers Infosys can deploy to help me with my back office claims [IT and BPO] and things like incentive compensation.

    I am a not surprised that Kakal has picked horizontal offerings to kick start this initiative – HR, Procurement. For years, the likes of ADP and Ceridian have cornered the HR markets, but have done zilch in terms of innovation. It will be good to see an Infosys and possibly some American companies as well come into the fray – we all know they can be more innovative.

    Jeff: did Kakal mention any customer names where this has been tried out. I’d be curious to hear some case studies.

  8. Posted March 5, 2010 at 4:00 am | Permalink

    Nice article. i am into this business since last few years. The benifit business platform provides in terms of effectiveness and efficiency (in terms of state of art multi-tenant architecture, best in class pre-configured technology and process capability), will provide much higher value which not only compensate sunk costs, but also provide higher benifits if measured in terms of NPV/FPV analysis, ROI.

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared. Required fields are marked *

*
*

MA reserves the right to edit comments for appropriateness.

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>