Manufacturing: The New Economy

Manufacturing is suddenly a hot topic in Washington. As anemic new-job creation continues to retard the economic recovery, politicians, policy experts, and national journalists have suddenly recognized that manufacturing has been a relative bright spot, one of the few sectors showing growth and the potential to increase exports and generate new, high-paying jobs.

President Obama has begun making weekly photo-op appearances at automotive factories and other plants, touting the importance of a strong manufacturing sector while also attempting to take credit for bailing out GM and Chrysler. And recently the House of Representatives overwhelmingly passed the National Manufacturing Strategy Act of 2010, a bill which, among other things, calls on the president to develop a national manufacturing strategy based on the recommendations of a manufacturing task force.

OK, a Washington task force alone is not going to reverse the long-term trends that have seen the loss of 16% of U.S. manufacturing employment since 2007. Only action like tax cuts, currency reform, and expanded R&D tax credits — in combination with continuing productivity improvement by manufacturers — will do that. But at least these developments show a rising recognition that manufacturing is a critical sector that needs investment and support.

That recognition is not universal, however. Perhaps predictably, as the national spotlight has begun to turn to manufacturing, naysayers have begun popping out of the woodwork to argue that manufacturing isn’t worth saving. In some cases, their positions reveal a profound misunderstanding of what manufacturing is all about.

Take Kevin Hassett, for example. Director of economic policy at the American Enterprise Institute and a Bloomberg News columnist, Hassett this week wrote a column in which he called the increased attention being given to manufacturing issues an “unhealthy fixation.” The decline in manufacturing from 28% of the gross domestic product in 1950 to 11% today is not a crisis, he said, nor is it “necessarily a cause for concern.” This trend, he insists, is simply “economic evolution, a natural and positive force.”

But here’s where Hassett goes way off the rails. He says the “new economy”—unlike the old, manufacturing-centric economy — is “ideas economy.”

“Over the past few decades, our economy has transformed dramatically, and the importance of innovation has increased sharply,” Hassett asserts.

The implication, of course, is that manufacturing is not driven by new ideas and innovation.

This, of course, is completely false. In 2007, U.S.  manufacturing companies made $157 billion worth of investments in research and development, representing 58% of all private R&D investments. Those investments have enabled an unprecedented level of productivity improvement in the manufacturing sector, one of the many factors that has depressed manufacturing employment.

Need more evidence of innovation and “new ideas” in manufacturing? Check out the winners of Managing Automation’s PM100 Awards. Over the past seven years, 350 manufacturing companies have been recognized for their ability to boost competitiveness and achieve growth by embracing innovative new technologies and, yes, “new ideas.”

Before writing off manufacturing as a lost cause, Hassett and people like him need to spend some time outside of the Beltway, meeting with some of the manufacturers on the PM100 list. They’ll learn that manufacturing is all about innovation.

Follow me on Twitter

This entry was posted in Enterprise Applications, Innovation and tagged , . Bookmark the permalink. Post a comment or leave a trackback: Trackback URL.

2 Comments

  1. Mark Anderson
    Posted August 23, 2010 at 12:11 pm | Permalink

    A key factor that is often forgotten is that the “idea” and “service” economies do not create wealth. They pass the money from one hand to another until it’s all gone, eventually either taxed away or socked away. Mining, agriculture, and manufacturing take materials of lesser value and make them worth more, thereby creating wealth. The rest of the stuff is just along for the ride. We’re going along for a slow ride into a dark alley now if we do not re-emphasize manfuacturing.

  2. Matt
    Posted August 23, 2010 at 11:44 am | Permalink

    I have been employed in the consumer products industry for over twenty years, and I would also suggest that as manufacturing jobs go to foreign shores it definitely makes it more difficult to develop new ideas independant of the manufacturing process. The very proximity of the manufacturing department allows engineers to gain insights into better and more efficient designs that might otherwise have missed or delayed. I would also suggest that for certain industries the obvious “next step” in cost cutting is to send the development responsibilities (i.e. “ideas economy”) to an off shore site as well.
    For companies who do have manufacturing located in foreign lands there is the added challenge of communicating across thousands of miles, cultures, and languages. Even when a foreign contact speaks the same language, it is very easy for misunderstandings to develop, which can detract from the savings potential. Obviously, international companies know all about these issues and continue to do business because the downside of producing goods overseas does not outweigh the cost savings. But that is not the question we are discussing here. I would argue that the continued development of the “ideas economy” discussed by Kevin Hassett is directly related to continued development of manufacturing jobs in the US. Are all the manufacturing jobs going to be here? Of course not, but we are going to be left holding the proverbial “bag” if we do not maintain a significant presence in this area.

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared. Required fields are marked *

*
*

MA reserves the right to edit comments for appropriateness.

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>