Manufacturing Executive

Why Didn’t Lean Save Toyota?

The grandfather of lean has fallen, and it can’t get up under its own weight.

This week, the venerable carmaker announced that it would incur an $8.6 billion loss in its recently closed fiscal year. It has slashed production and is struggling to clear bloated inventories.

How did Toyota — progenitor of the Just-in-Time concept — get so far off its own tracks? I think the answer is simple: It abandoned one of the core tenets of JIT. It does not produce automobiles based on customer sales. It produces them based on dealer orders. That simple twist adds a layer of unpredictability into the value chain. Dealers place orders based on what they think they will sell, after all, but the people with the final say are those like you and me who drive the cars off the lot. Or, in recent times, leave them sitting on said lots.

Just in Time, in its purest form, is a thing of beauty. Read Toyota’s description of it on their website — it sounds like poetry in motion. But the marketplace doesn’t care for poetry. We don’t want to place our order and watch the gears — perfectly meshed though they may be — smoothly churn out our product. We want our hamburgers pre-cooked and waiting for us under a heat lamp. In that world, Just-in-Time has no place. It’s a museum piece, a relic of a more patient era.

In this world of pre-heated hamburgers and mass customization, Toyota and its counterparts are forced to produce not to actual demand, but to expected demand. And that, my friends, not only belies JIT; it creates a huge amount of risk.

This, in part, explains why Toyota lost more money than GM did in the first three months of 2009. (Yes, you read that right.) Toyota was on cruise control, enjoying market popularity and sales increases. It produced to that scenario. When that scenario disappeared almost overnight, Toyota was left holding the grenade. GM, meanwhile, had trouble on its hands even before the recessionary sales plunge, so it had a head start on adjusting production and costs downward (although some would say it still failed to do either adequately).

A New York Times article illustrates just how far from its roots Toyota strayed:

Previously, plants operated under the sales force’s direction of “you make them, we will sell them,” said Real C. Tanguay, president of Toyota Motor Manufacturing Canada. Now the philosophy is, “if we can sell them, then you will make them,” he said.

Oh, how the mighty have fallen. Who would have predicted that a Toyota executive would ever sum up the company’s philosophy as, “You make them, we will sell them”?

His description of the revised mantra – “if we can sell them, then you will make them” – is a return to the company’s core belief in Just in Time. But even that won’t work as neatly as it does on paper, or on a corporate website. Someone needs to tell Toyota that you can’t go home again. JIT is dead.

Posted in Lean Matters | Tagged , , , , , | 32 Comments

Watch Out! Lean's in Vogue

This week I read a news story describing a trio of new offerings from IT product and service juggernaut CA. The products help govern the methods that IT departments use to deliver services to their constituents (anything from fixing a frozen screen to installing new software), and how those constituents order those services.

So I was a little confused when I read the quote attributed to CA’s vice president of marketing, Kathy Shoop: “We’re taking a page out of the book of lean manufacturing. This process has been used for years in manufacturing and Toyota is its best-known practitioner.”

What? Maybe the writer reported the quote out of context. Either way, it’s a long leap from creating more efficiency on the factory floor to delivering IT provisioning software. And it underscores the point: It pays to be wary of lean look-alikes. Lean is in vogue right now, and people will gladly hang their hat on that hook. Popularity always attracts attention, and some hangers-on.

Stick to the core principles, and stay focused on value chain in your manufacturing process.

How are your lean efforts bearing up under the pressure of the recession?


Need help in this rapidly changing economy? Progressive Manufacturing Summit 2009: Redefining the Business of Manufacturing in Turbulent Economic Times is an invitation-only event for senior-level manufacturing executives, providing you with the opportunity to gain insight and expand your knowledge, network with your peers, and walk away with a tangible action plan to address the toughest economic environment we have seen in years. Register Now.

Posted in Lean Matters | Tagged , , | 1 Comment

Hire Numbers

Yesterday I watched economic pundits duke it out over the U.S. unemployment rate, with one camp claiming we are headed to double-digit jobless rates from our current 8.5%, the other saying hiring is about to pick up.

This morning the New York Times ran an article demystifying the pandemic of layoffs we’ve all heard about over the past couple of quarters. That news tends to crowd out a more hopeful reality, the article noted. A monthly job report showing that 650,000 jobs were lost is a net assessment, Robert J. Barbera, chief economist at ITG, told the Times. More than 650,000 jobs were actually cut, but a lot of positions were filled, too, to reach that figure. The article goes on to cite a recent report that 3 million open positions exist in the U.S. While I tend to believe that a certain percentage of those involve the kind of “get rich working from home” jobs that no one really believes or wants, it does hint at revival.

Large companies — manufacturers and others — have been most aggressive with the layoff ax. I suspect that smaller manufacturers are fighting to trim costs without resorting to layoffs, but some, of course, have given in. I also suspect that these companies will be the ones that help bring that unemployment number down. The Times article notes that it’s a great time for companies to find idle talent and kick start business again.

After I’d listened to the pundits, I found a very interesting jobs website that actually homes in on lean manufacturing hiring. OdinJobs is a beta site that covers the whole country and displays a bevy of recent manufacturing job postings. The cool part: It shows a map of the country with a state-by-state gauge of lean manufacturing jobs availability. California, Illinois, North Carolina, Ohio, and Texas show the most activity. Kansas, Arkansas, and Nebraska are among the states with the fewest lean job postings.

I’d like to see what Lean Matters’ readers think of it. Check out the site and let me know if it squares with what you’ve seen in your state. And what about hiring — is your company expanding payroll? Or are you still fighting against layoffs?


Need help in this rapidly changing economy? Progressive Manufacturing Summit 2009: Redefining the Business of Manufacturing in Turbulent Economic Times is an invitation-only event for senior-level manufacturing executives, providing you with the opportunity to gain insight and expand your knowledge, network with your peers, and walk away with a tangible action plan to address the toughest economic environment we have seen in years. Register Now.

Posted in Lean Matters | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Learning from Winners

Minnesota’s Manufacturers Alliance recently revealed its Manufacturer of the Year recipient, and, not surprisingly for Lean Matters readers, the top dog in the small business category earned its stripes in part due to a lean manufacturing effort.

My hat is off to Robinson Rubber Products of Minneapolis for the recognition. I also doff my cap to the Manufacturers Alliance itself. It’s not always a simple matter to maintain an awards program. There’s often a very intensive process taking place behind the scenes long before that congratulatory press release goes out. (We know this here at Managing Automation, as we comb through hundreds of great nominations for our Progressive Manufacturing Awards and Summit each year.)

The notoriety that comes with these awards also helps to raise the stature of manufacturing, a worthier pursuit these days than ever before, perhaps. So, my congrats to Robinson for their efforts to better their business through lean strategies, and a nod to the Minnesota Manufacturers Alliance and all the other groups out there promoting sustainable practices and lean operations. To read up on Robinson and the other winners, check out this link. To read up on the most recent winner of Managing Automation’s Operational Excellence Progressive Manufacturing Award, click here. Stay tuned for the announcement of this year’s High Achievers. Join us at the conference in June (see below for info) or watch for updates on the site and in the magazine.


Need help in this rapidly changing economy? Progressive Manufacturing Summit 2009: Redefining the Business of Manufacturing in Turbulent Economic Times is an invitation-only event for senior-level manufacturing executives, providing you with the opportunity to gain insight and expand your knowledge, network with your peers, and walk away with a tangible action plan to address the toughest economic environment we have seen in years. Register Now.

Posted in Lean Matters | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

A Lean Technology Pitch

If I were a lean manufacturer or a lean manufacturer in training, I imagine the concept of software as a service (SaaS) and its cousin, cloud computing, would look pretty appealing. One of the main selling points of on-demand software and cloud computing is a reduction of waste. The end user company is spared the effort and expense of buying servers, installing and maintaining them, and paying for them up front. These days all kinds of tech tools have been moved from their traditional on-premise deployments to virtualized data centers somewhere far off site. And all kinds of apps have moved in this direction, not just salesforce.com-like CRM systems. The allure to the customer is relatively simple: Save working capital by renting the computing power and applications one needs, using the Web to tap into both.

Nice and simple, and lean-sounding, right? Well, don’t get out the company checkbook so quickly. All you need to know to give you pause is that there is now an organization called the Cloud Computing Interoperability Forum. Turns out the cloud-based model of computing and apps delivery is no different from so many tech revolutions of the past: It almost immediately creates a standardization challenge. That is, if a manufacturer uses one vendor for its on-demand order management system and another for basic accounting and payroll functions, what happens when one needs to interact with the other?

The challenge of cloud computing, according to Reuven Cohen, head of the Cloud Computing Interoperability Forum, is that each vendor has its own set of application programming interfaces (APIs). The new normal has even spawned integration specialists such as Boomi, which MA featured last year as one of our “Companies to Watch.”

So, while lean-minded companies may be drawn to the concept of SaaS apps and cloud computing, keep in mind that the money saved by dispensing with up-front costs may be lost on integration efforts if you don’t ask the right up-front questions about interoperability.

Posted in Lean Matters | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

All I Really Need to Know…

I often think of the book All I Really Need to Know I Learned in Kindergarten when I consider lean manufacturing’s core principles. Robert Fulghum wrote that book in the late 1980s, but, like any elemental truth, it remains evergreen. His premise is right there in the title: Just think back to kindergarten if you want to remember how to live life right. Share everything, play fair, don’t hit people, he says. Clean up your own mess.

Lean dogma isn’t much more complicated. I was reminded of that today when I read an article in the Sheboygan (WI) Press that highlighted the lean journey of machine maker Kurtz North America Inc. The highlight of the transformation? After training, employees are now putting tools back where they belong when they’re finished with them.

In that spirit, I propose a lean version of Robert Fulghum’s tome, and it would start with a couple of simple truths:

Don’t be wasteful.

Put things back where you found them.

Keep your area clean.

I’m sure we could come up with a comprehensive list in no time. This isn’t very complicated stuff, after all…

 

Posted in Lean Matters | Leave a comment

Bad News That’s Good News

If you’re like me, you’ve hit a wall when it comes to economic reports. I caught my fill at least a month ago and, ever since, I’ve avoided bad news like the plague — which is to say I’ve avoided all news. Each of us has a tipping point, after all, and beyond that it’s just noise. 

So it’s interesting to hear bad news spun in a positive light, which was the case in a Bloomberg article Tuesday. The thesis of Matthew Benjamin’s and Simon Kennedy’s article is similar to the one I floated last week: that the crumbling economy has pulled some manufacturers into the operational excellence fold through the side door.

The focus in this case is on inventories, which have shown a steady decline over the past few months (kind of like my good cheer). The industry seems to be coming around to the opinion that this is actually a good thing because stockpiles had grown way too big.

In the article, the authors paraphrase Elga Bartsch, chief European economist at Morgan Stanley in London, as saying: 

Now, just- in-time inventory management and closer interaction between firms at different stages of the supply chain mean companies’ stocks are in better synch with the economy, she says.

That, in turn, bodes well when the news finally turns and the economy picks up. And then we’ll see who has taken to heart the notion of continuous improvement and who was just shifting with the wind.

What does your inventory look like these days?

 

Posted in Lean Matters | Leave a comment

Our New Culture of Liquidity

I’m looking forward to seeing how our new culture of liquidity will affect the industrial community, particularly its embrace of lean manufacturing.

The gruesome last year of papier-mâché investment banks and the current skepticism about the viability of commercial banks such as Citi and Bank of America has spurred a reassessment of liquidity, both for businesses and individuals. The concept of long-term borrowing as standard operating procedure has lost some of its luster. The new normal: Buy what you can afford.

Lean dovetails nicely with this frugality. That alone might earn it some converts in the coming months. An article in the latest Business Week (“Lean and Mean Gets Extreme,” not yet online) suggests that it already has. My fear is that manufacturers will reflexively adopt select lean practices without even realizing it, and without a unifying philosophy behind them, focusing instead on cost reduction. And cost reduction, as we know, does not a lean manufacturer make.

I spoke last week with Steve Huffman, who keeps a busy schedule as a VP of strategic accounts at Mead O’Brien, an instrumentation distributor, and in his spare time chairs the Automation Federation, which earned a Progressive Manufacturing 100 berth this year in the Education and Training category. Steve told me he was up on Capitol Hill recently, lobbying for more funding for the nation’s Manufacturing Extension Program, a vital link to progressive manufacturing practices, lean included. The MEP seems to be endangered during every budget-setting session.

Maybe a boost from the companies the MEP was meant to serve would help save it – even expand it. See what the organization can do for you, and if you’ve benefited from its services, spread the word.

While I don’t like the mess we’ve landed in as a global economy, I like that it has created an aversion to overborrowing and overproducing, and encourages manufacturers to truly align with customer demand. I just hope the companies that are newly steeped in this mind-set understand the history and entirety of it.

 

Posted in Lean Matters | Leave a comment

Here’s How to Change

I spent a portion of my day reading through Change without Migraines, by Rick Maurer, a change management consultant and founder of Maurer & Associates.

We’ve all had experience on either side of change — as the one asked to change and as the one who requests it. Recently, for example, city planners reconstructed a major highway interchange near my home. The new route was intuitive and efficient, not to mention more structurally sound. But I didn’t immediately embrace it. I’d spent 20+ years of my life bearing left at that certain point in the road, and now they wanted me to bear right. It felt wrong.

Alas, there’s nostalgia in everything we do — even the cumbersome things. Any company that moves toward a lean environment knows this.

Essentially, Maurer’s advice for bettering the process of change is to first acknowledge that it will invoke resistance. No sleight of hand will make a workforce adjustment — whether it’s ekanban, a redefinition of work roles, or a new stamping machine — seamless and enjoyable. With due respect to Maurer, that means a few migraines are inevitable. The secret sauce he offers is that while resistance to change is inevitable, it is not insurmountable, and thoughtful and early planning by change leaders can help defuse the knee-jerk reaction. The existence of planning, therefore, is a better indicator of success than resistance is an indicator of failure.

Maurer writes:

Resistance is not the primary reason why changes fail. The real problem is that leaders plan and instigate major changes in ways that create inertia, apathy, and opposition.

There’s an obvious logic behind his assertion. If change aversion were the only culprit, all projects would fail, because aversion is always there. But smart companies make a plan to subdue it. This leads into his clock-based model of an employee’s relationship to change, which cycles through stages such as “In the Dark,” “See the Challenge,” “Get Started,” “Keep Change Alive,” “Results,” etc. 

Maurer has initiated what he calls an Open Source Project for change management. His website offers a free version of an introduction to Change without Migraines as well as some videos and PowerPoint slides that he encourages visitors to use in their own change efforts. You might want to check it out — regardless of which side of change you’re on.

On a side note, as I read about employees who fear change because it might jeopardize their job security, it struck me that we’ve never had a better time to enact lean initiatives. These days the entire workforce is shaking in its boots, wondering when the next ax might fall. Why not turn that climate of fear into a positive by rallying the troops around an ekanban system, basic 5S, or some other continuous improvement initiative you’ve held back on?

Let me know how your efforts are going.

As for the change management question, check out another perspective from Managing Automation’s Ask the Expert forum.

 

Posted in Lean Matters | Leave a comment

Enough of ”More with Less”

I don’t know about you, but I’m sick of the term “doing more with less.” You may have noticed this platitude in vendor pitches and whitepaper titles since the economy began its tumble. At first it seemed like a plucky response to a bad situation. In the face of layoffs unprecedented in their scope, it sounds a little obnoxious.

It’s rare that we really can do more with less. I’ve been part of workforces that shrunk, and I’ve never seen fewer people actually do more work while maintaining product quality (not to mention personal sanity). “More with less” seems to have graduated from the school of marketing-speak that usually features an asterisk and a long list of possible side effects.

The lean version of “more with less” is “better with the same.” Managers who get lean right don’t look to sack workers once processes have been optimized — they look to get more value from those employees by applying their skills to other endeavors.

The temptation, under our present circumstances and even in more prosperous times, is to “trim the fat” after process reengineering produces greater efficiencies. It takes courage to keep workers on, as Toyota has done, for instance, at its San Antonio truck assembly plant.

Who’s to say at this point whether that courage will be rewarded or exposed as folly. Either way, it jibes with the philosophy of a well-run company, which holds that when demand returns, the company should be ready for a quick production ramp-up. Hiring back workers and training new ones is anything but a lean response. 

What do you think – is “more with less” in line with lean teaching?

 

Posted in Lean Matters | 2 Comments